How Paul Mazursky watched Umberto D. for a second time. 

Irwin Lawrence “Paul” Mazursky (April 25, 1930 – June 30, 2014) was an American film director, screenwriter, and actor. Known for his dramatic comedies that often dealt with modern social issues, he was nominated for five Academy Awards: three times for Best Original Screenplay, once for Best Adapted Screenplay, and once for Best Picture for An Unmarried Woman (1978). Other films written and directed by Mazursky include Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice (1969), Blume in Love (1973), Harry and Tonto (1974), Moscow on the Hudson (1984), and Down and Out in Beverly Hills (1986).

 

In this piece, Paul Mazursky, wrote about his meeting with the director, Vittorio De Sica and about his second view of Umberto D. 

_______________________

In February of 1971, I moved to Rome with my wife and our two daughters. After the great success of Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice, I experienced the commercial failure of my next film Alex in Wonderland.  Hollywood seemed hostile and empty, perhaps Europe was the answer. We found a lovely apartment on Passeggiata di Ripetta near Piazza deal Popolo. We put the girls, age six and twelve, in the Overseas School and soon I was spending hours sitting in cafes of Rome and wondering what I was doing here so far from home.  Fortunately, we became friends with Emi De Sica, the daughter of the great Vittorio. Her daughter Eleonora became with our six year old, Jill. Several times a week we’d have magnificent dinners often cooked by Emi. 

My waistline got larger and my angst grew too. I began to write a story for. Film about an old man and his car Harry and Tonto

My. Other had kept a red manx cat and walked it on a leash in the park. There was a movie there – somewhere -, a movie about old age. 

Then Emi invited us to her house for her birthday. It was a beautiful party, filled with important figures from the Italian cinema. Emi introduced me to her father. Here was the great De Sica. I was overwhelmed wit the sudden appearance of one of my idols. Scenes from Sciuscià and Bicycle Thief rushed into my brain.  “Let me get you something to eat”, said De Sica. He picked up a plate and began to fill it with antipasto. Here I was being served by Vittorio De Sica. I didn’t really know what to say. I didn’t want to flatter or fawn. “I very much liked your film Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice“, said De Sica. I was close to a heart attack! Suddenly, out of nowhere I told De Sica that I was writing a story about an old man and a cat.  “Have you seen my film Umberto D.?” asked De Sica. “Yes”, I said.  “Maybe I got the idea from your film – It’s beautiful.”  “Would you like to see it again?” asked De Sica.  “Yes, of course. Sure. When?”. “Come with me, please.”  The elegant director led me downstairs to the basement of the house in Parioli.  There was a 16 mm projector. He found what he was looking for and in a matter of minutes, I was staring at Umberto D., munching on my antipasto as I watched. Now and then, De Sica would tell me something about the film, how he used an untrained man, a professor, to play the lead. The film seemed even more powerful to me. When the moment came in front the Pantheon and the old man began to beg, to put his palm up for a hand-out and suddenly moved his hand as if perhaps it was beginning to rain, I began to fight the tears. “You know”, I said, “I probably end up stealing a lot of your movie”.  Vittorio De Sica smile, “Please take what you want”.

  

And that’s how I came to see Umberto D. for a second time. Of course, I will never forget my meeting. But none of us will ever forget the great work of De Sica. The seemingly simple way he told these sad and funny stories of Italian life and film that truly got into your soul. 

(Paul Mazursky)

Taken from an old article published by the Italian newspaper “Il Corriere Della Sera” – date: unknown

  

Advertisements

Umberto D (1952) – The worst side of reality?

Umberto D. – Italy – 1952 – 88 minutes – Black & White – 1.37:1 – Italian – Criterion Collection Spine #201

  

“I’m tired, tired of everything.”

FOREWORD

Umberto D. is a neorealist film in a sense, but it is also something of a departure – it has a certain elegance, a beauty in its construction and way it is visualized. But it is still involving in the same way Ladri Di Biciclette and Sciuscia’ were.  My friend and I were not aware of the pace or the design. It was a story, pure and simple, and we were totally identifying with the old man. There is a sense of doom hanging over Umberto D and the girl, but it is not forced – it’s simply there in the terrible reality of post-war in Italy. De Sica and Zavattini plan and shoot actions, moments rather than scenes. They draw gently into the rhythm of the man’s life, the habits, the rituals – by the time the film is over you feel as though you have lived in that room, as though you know every inch of the hallway outside – so that you’re seeing things from his perspective, life the way he lives it.     Umberto D. is a real emotional ride but you couldn’t call it a tearjerker. Orson Welles once said that he admired De Sica because he could do something that Welles could never dream of, which is make the camera “disappear”. Welles was talking about Sciascia’, but the same could be said of Umberto D.   (Martin Scorsese)

Umberto_d

Umberto D. is an emblematic movie of Italian neorealism and it is one of the most successful artistic creations of the couple De Sica (director) – Zavattini (writer). Some critics, when the film was released, accused the duo of showing only the worst side of reality. A famous Italian politician, at that time, once said that, after watching the movie, he had to go home and have his clothes washed because he felt dirty. “It felt like a stab in the back”, he also added.

The film is dedicated to Umberto De Sica and perhaps the name of the protagonist – the pensioner Umberto Domenico Ferrari – is a further tribute to Vittorio De Sica’ father,  although the D. (with the . after it) could mean depersonalization of a man who loses dignity.

Umberto D. is a movie about of a pensioner who lives alone. A man who cannot afford to get to the end of the month, despite already living a very modest life.  It is a story of a defeated man surrounded by a cruel society that brutally pushes him in a corner. A society that does not know what to do with him.  He now lives in a hostile harsh world. He even contemplates suicide.

At the beginning of the movie we see Umberto D. trying to sell some old books and his watch to raise money. His landlady wants to evict him since he has not been able pay the rent. Only two things are keeping him alive and sane: the affection for his dog and Maria, the young servant in the house where he is renting a room.  The maid is pregnant but not married, which at that time was a great shame. Her boyfriend is a soldier in Florence who does not want to marry her.  Umberto tries a few times to cheer her up and to talk about her problems but their ideas are too far apart. They do not understand each other because they are too distant generations.

The Director paints a picture of deep solitude around the protagonists, also using an intense music score, with background noise that alternates with short dialogues.

Umberto D.  has tonsillitis and gets to the hospital  just so he can finally eat decent meals without paying.  He even befriends a nun, with the help of another patient, to extend the stay.

After leaving the hospital, he finds out that he hasn’t got a place where to live anymore. His landlady has already started the works to extend her room into the old man’s one.

A desperate Umberto contemplates suicide: “I’m tired, tired of everything”, he says He caresses his dog, takes the suitcase and decides to leave.

Now the most dramatic part of De Sica’s movie begins. Umberto would entrust the dog to someone, but nobody is willing to keep it for free and especially not to secure him and treat him well.  Umberto decides to die with his dog. De Sica immortalises his intense expression in a dramatic shot as he approaches the level crossing. He is about to get hit by a train but the dog saves him  by running away. Umberto tries to catch him desisting from committing suicide.

The last shot of the movie represents hope:  the pensioner runs with his dog as he passes a group of children.

hero_EB20020428REVIEWS08204280301AR

AFTERWORD

I watched again Umberto D., whilst preparing for this #criterionblogathon, with a different attitude comparing to the one I had when I saw it the first time (I was 18 when Umberto D. entered my life).  In the meantime I have grown up and, let’s face it, got older too.

I am certainly not a movie critic, but I think that some of the scenes from this movie are pure poetry, with images that speak for themselves, without the use of any words. The gestures of everyday life, leaving to the images rather than a dialogue to tell the story.  Some moments, like the one where Umberto holds his hand out and then suddenly turns it the other way (like if he realises he was going to betray his dignity), reminded me of some Charlie Chaplin short movies where a smile is overwhelmed by sadness and tears.

More people should watch this masterpiece but, I fear, only few will ever see it. Because, in our world, a story without violence, without the exaltation of success, without the presence of a hero, without sex, will never be fully appreciated apart from real movie lovers.

What’s happening to Umberto D.? At the end of the movie he does not die. He just goes away with his little dog. Where is he going? What is he going to do tomorrow? What kind of life is he going to have?  

vittorio_de_sica_40_anni_dalla_morte-10_umberto_d

Umberto D. (1952) – Directed by Vittorio De Sica – Writer: Carlo Zavattini – Actors: Carlo Battisti, Maria Pia Casilio, Lina Gennari, the Dog

IMG_8859